People are starving, but money is spent on pets - EssayForum
: Money Spent on Pets : Pet Trust Law Blog
The pet industry has grown enormously over the last 10 years, and it continues to grow. As a result it has opened up many ways to make quick money. Dogs have become the loved possessions of 40% of all households in the USA.
In some urban centers pets outnumber children. According to San Francisco's Animal Care and Control department, for example, the city is host to 120,000 dogs and between 108,000 to 113,000 children.
Dog owners are more than willing to pay for services that they find will benefit their pets. Dog walking is one of these profitable services, and it's extremely easy to setup, manage and specialize in, because of the large variety of owners and breeds.
Of all the services provided to dog owners in the USA, dog walking has actually proven to be the most recession proof. Dog grooming, dog sitting, and dog day cares have seen a decline in business with the current recession, while dog walking has continued steadily and even picked up in certain parts of the country.
During hard times, dog owners spend more time working to pay the bills. They leave their dogs unattended in the house for many hours in the day.
Since dog owners can't bear the thought of their precious pooches being cooped up like prisoners all day, nor the sight of returning to a house that smells and looks like a kennel gone wild, they look to the only alternative available have someone come periodically to take their beloved canines out for a well needed walk.
Due to the increasing amount of money spent on pets, dog walking services are rising amongst urban and suburban America. Dog walking is definitely one of several ways to make quick money today!
Of the several ways to make quick money by exploiting the huge attention that millions of households pay to their pets, dog walking is by far the most profitable for the least amount of effort.
How much money is spent on pets - Xmedia Partners
More than half of pet owners plan to buy their furry friends gifts this this holiday season. And the says the amount of money spent on pets this season is increasing – up five dollars a pet since 2013. For some Oklahoma pets, that means a very merry holiday.
That's not a tiger in the picture, but a dog dyed to look like a tiger. It's an example of a growing hobby in China: dying and trimming dogs' hair so that they look like different animals. The Chinese were very quick to embrace this bizarre trend, and it is not unusual for owners to take their dogs to grooming parlours where they are not only given a shampoo and trim, but a multi-coloured dye job as well. Recent figures show money spent on pets across the nation has seen nearly a 500 per cent increase between 1999 and 2008 – but, arguably, at the cost of their pets' dignity. What the animals might think about it is another matter. ( | )For those of you who feel money spent on pets could be better spent elsewhere, I will gladly do an analysis of your spending habits the last year or so and identify money that could be freed up for the greater good.But this isn't federal or state tax money being spent on pets. It's people's own net incomes, and it's not the government's or anyone else's business how people choose to spend their money. Whether they throw it on a new collar for Fido or give it all to charity, it has to be their choice. I'm not saying we have to agree with their choice, but we should respect their right to do so and let their conscience dictate their spending habits.Among the most intriguing of Serpell’s conjectures is his suggestion that in modern societies, pets may have replaced totemic animals as guilt absolvers — that by lavishing love on the dogs and cats in our homes we assuage the guilt associated with the consumption of creatures we define as food rather than friends. While not the central focus of his essay, this idea is amenable to empirical verification. If Serpell is correct, one might predict that vegetarians, because they presumably experience less meat remorse, would have less need to own pets. In addition, aspects of pet ownerships (e.g., the amount of money spent on pets, individual differences in attachment to pets) should be positively correlated with meat consumption. (My guess is that these are not true.)